Campus Self-Evaluation Matrix

Awareness and Eligibility

← Less Promising | More Promising →

1. Indicator: The institution has and disseminates promotional materials and conducts student orientation activities that are accessible to all students during orientation, including a list of assistive technologies available.
   1. 1. The institution does not have accessible materials or activities available during orientation and does not disseminate a listing of assistive technologies available for student use.
   2. 2. The institution has limited promotional materials listing assistive technologies and does not actively promote them.
   3. 3. The institution has ample promotional materials available that include a list of assistive technologies but the are only provided by request.
   4. 4. The institution has developed effective promotional materials, but inconsistently disseminates them or includes them in orientation activities available to students.
   5. 5. The institution has easy to find and accessible promotional materials and activities and uses them consistently in orientation activities regarding assistive technologies available to students.
2. Indicator: The institution has and disseminates, material, regarding the use of assistive technologies, where the eligibility process is clearly stated. It includes an explanation of required documentation and disability disclosure necessary.
   1. 1. The institution does not clearly state or communicate the eligibility process or explain required documentation and disclosure necessary to access student services and related institution programs regarding the use of assistive technologies.
   2. 2. The institution has some materials that describe the eligibility process, but does not offer a consistent or easy to follow explanation of the required documentation and disclosure necessary to access student services and related institution programs regarding the use of assistive technologies.
   3. 3. The institution has some parts of a clearly stated eligibility process explaining the required documentation and disability disclosure to access student services and related institution programs regarding the use of assistive technologies, but the information is not widely disseminated or readily available.
   4. 4. The institution has promotional materials available on request, that communicate eligibility process and an explanation of the required documentation and disability disclosure necessary to access student services and related institution programs for use of assistive technologies.
   5. 5. The institution has and actively disseminates complete materials that communicate a clearly stated eligibility process and have a consistent explanation of the required documentation and disability disclosure necessary to access student services and related institution programs for use with assistive technologies.
3. Indicator: The disability service office has an in-house or referral based process for basic assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies.
   1. 1. The disability service office does not any process for basic assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies.
   2. 2. The disability service office has conducts or refers for assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies, but the process is not consistent or uniformly effective.
   3. 3. The disability service office has an in-house or referral based process for assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies and supports which must be requested by a student.
   4. 4. The disability service office has an in-house or referral based process for basic assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies and supports which they sometimes offer.
   5. 5. The disability service office consistently uses an effective in-house or referral based process for assessment and selection of appropriate assistive technologies and supports which they proactively and consistently offer.
4. Indicator: The intake process of the disability services office includes information and questions about previous assistive technology use.
   1. 1. No questions are included in the disability services office intake process about previous assistive technology use.
   2. 2. Only a few questions or sources of information are included in the disability services office intake process about previous assistive technology use.
   3. 3. The intake process of the disability services office sometimes includes comprehensive questions about previous assistive technology use.
   4. 4. The intake process of the disability services office includes comprehensive information and questions about previous assistive and use, but that information is not applied to the assessment process.
   5. 5. The intake process of the disability services office consistently includes comprehensive information and questions about previous assistive technology use and applies that information to the intake process.
5. Indicator: The disabilities service office supports the accessibility of the information technology infrastructure, such as accessible website to register for classes or a work station with assistive technology in each computer lab.
   1. 1. The disability service office is not involved in the accessible technology and the information technology infrastructure is not accessible to incoming students with disabilities in most instances.
   2. 2. The disability services office is only peripherally involved with supporting the accessibility of the information infrastructure.
   3. 3. The disabilities services office has some impact on the accessibility of the institution information technology infrastructure.
   4. 4. The disability services office usually supports and is improving the accessibility of the information technology infrastructure of the institution.
   5. 5. The disability services office consistently supports and improves the accessibility of the information technology infrastructure on institution.

After you complete this area, you will automatically move on to the next section.